Dilemma and Prospects of Non-litigation Settlement System of Forest Property Dispute
-
摘要: 林权纠纷根据法律属性可分为林权民事纠纷、林权行政纠纷和林权刑事纠纷, 实践中最主要的是林权民事纠纷。我国林权民事纠纷主要通过非诉方法解决, 但实践中面临诸多困境, 主要包括法律效力低、政府依赖性强、解决机制类型单一和生态公益性缺失等。对此, 应通过提高非诉解决方法的道德舆论效力、成立行业性非诉纠纷解决组织、培养优秀的专业调解员、适当提高调解的公开度以及建立有效的调解责任追究机制和经济激励机制等来作有效应对。Abstract: According to the law attributes, forest property disputes can be divided into civil disputes, administrative disputes and criminal disputes, and in practice the most involved is civil disputes.China's civil disputes of forest property are resolved primarily through non-litigation settlement system, but in practice, non-litigation settlement system faces many difficulties, mainly including the low force of law, strong government-dependence, few settlement mechanism applied and lack of ecological and public services and so on.In order to improve the ability to deal with forest property disputes, the following measures can be taken, such as increasing the moral power of non-litigation settlement system, establishing industry-based non-litigation dispute resolution organizations, training excellent professional mediators, appropriately increasing the openness of mediation, and establishing an effective accountability mechanism for mediation and an economic incentive mechanism.
-
[1] 周伯煌, 雷小珍.林权争议中的行政调解方法探析[J].行政与法, 2009(1):85-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8207.2009.01.027 [2] 周伯煌, 宣裕方, 余玉豹.林权争议的参与式调解方法[J].浙江林学院学报, 2007, 23(4):473-477. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2007.04.017 [3] 范愉.ADR原理与实务[M].福建:厦门大学出版社, 2002. [4] 肖易儒, 周训芳.林权纠纷的解决方式探析[J].中南林业科技大学学报:社会科学版, 2009, 3(2):58-61. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hnjjglgbxyxb200902014 [5] 杜国明, 江华.论林权纠纷化解机制[J].调研世界, 2009(5):8-11. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/diaoysj200905002 [6] 王晓峰.我国环境纠纷处理立法现状研究[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2007. [7] 陈永富, 周伯煌, 张慧.浙江省山林权属纠纷现状及对策研究[J].浙江林业科技, 2003, 3(2):57-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2003.02.017 [8] Karl Mackie, David Miles, William Marsh, et al.The ADR practice guide:commercial dispute resolution[M].Butterworths, 2000:102. [9] 陈永富.浙江省林权争议理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社, 2003. [10] 陈永富, 程云行, 李兰英, 等.山林权属纠纷调处方法比较研究[J].浙江林学院学报, 2004, 21(2):198-202. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2004.02.018 [11] 陈永富, 周伯煌.论浙江省山林权属纠纷积案的调处[J].林业经济, 2003(7):40-43. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lszg200307015 [12] 范愉.非诉讼程序(ADR)教程[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2002. [13] Posner.The summary jury trial and other methods of alternative dispute resolution:some cautionary observation[J].University of Chicago Law Review, 1986, 53:387. [14] 白绿铉.美国民事诉讼法[M].北京:经济日报出版社, 1998. [15] 乔钢梁.美国法律的调解和仲裁制度[J].政法论坛, 1995(3):19-22. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/81213X/199503/1002839200.html [16] Peter Hibberd, Paul Newman.ADR and adjudication in construction disputes[M].Blackwell Science, 1999:142. [17] 中国国际贸易促进委员会, 中国国际商会调解中心组织.中国商事调解理论与实务[M].北京:中国民主法制出版社, 2002. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 69
- HTML全文浏览量: 13
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
