视觉追踪辅助技术在森林景观评价中的应用

张喆; 郄光发; 王成; 姜莎莎; 李茜; 李明霞

doi:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2017.0043.y

视觉追踪辅助技术在森林景观评价中的应用

doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2017.0043.y

张喆^{1, 2,},
郄光发^{1, 2, ,},
王成^{1, 2},
姜莎莎^{1, 2},
李茜^{1, 2},
李明霞^{1, 2}

1.
中国林业科学研究院林业研究所, 国家林业局林木培育重点实验室, 北京 100091
2.
国家林业局城市森林研究中心, 北京 100091

基金项目:

国家林业公益性行业科研专项 201404301

详细信息

作者简介:
张喆(1989-), 女, 博士研究生, 研究方向为城市森林, E-mail:zz8990@qq.com

通讯作者:
郄光发(1978-), 男, 副研究员, 博士, 研究方向为城市森林, E-mail:qiegf@126.com

中图分类号: S718.5;S73
计量
- 文章访问数: 1816
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 956
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-02-23
- 修回日期: 2017-06-13
- 刊出日期: 2017-10-01

Application of Eye-tracking Assistive Technology in Forest Landscape Evaluation

Zhe Zhang^{1, 2
,},
Guangfa Qie^{1, 2
, ,},
Cheng Wang^{1, 2},
Shasha Jiang^{1, 2},
Xi Li^{1, 2},
Mingxia Li^{1, 2}

1.
Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry; Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100091, China
2.
Research Center of Urban Forest, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100091, China

摘要

摘要: 森林景观评价是对森林健康和森林美丽程度进行判别的主要方式。但目前仅能通过总体评价以及问卷调查等方式获得评价结果，而对"人在森林景观中究竟看什么、如何看"这一基本问题始终缺少科学的量化方法。随着科学技术的发展，视觉追踪技术已经成为解决该问题的有效手段，尤其是近10年来，该技术已逐步出现在欧美学者的森林景观评价研究中，为科学探讨人体注视森林景观的视觉行为规律提供了支持。文中基于当前欧美地区利用视觉追踪技术的评价应用情况，总结常见的视觉追踪技术硬件特点和使用范围，阐述配套软件类型和主要视觉分析参数，探讨视觉追踪技术辅助森林景观评价的应用前景，以期为森林景观资源深入和细化评价与研究提供参考。
- 视觉追踪技术 /
- 森林景观资源 /
- 森林景观评价辅助技术
Abstract: Forest landscape evaluation is the main way to assess forest health and amenity, but current evaluation always adopts overall evaluation and the questionnaire survey for the results. There is lack of the science-based quantitative methods for the basic questions "what and how do people in the forest landscape look at". With science and technology development, visual tracking technology has become an effective means to solve this problem, and especially in the recent ten years, the technology has gradually been employed in European and American scholars' study on forest landscape evaluation, which provides support to the scientific analysis of visual behavior rules that the human eyes on forest landscape. With the review of current evaluation and application of visual tracking technology in Europe and America, this paper summarized the characteristics and application areas of visual tracking hardware, and put forward the types of bundled software and their main analysis parameters. The application prospect of visual tracking technology in forest landscape evaluation is discussed, in order to provide the reference for in-depth and detailed evaluation of forest landscape.
- eye tracking technology /
- forest landscape resources /
- landscape evaluation assistive technology

HTML全文

图 1 视觉追踪技术在森林景观评价中的辅助作用

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(14)

[1]	SCOTT A. Assessing public perception of landscape:the LANDMAP experience[J]. Landscape Research, 2002, 27(3):271-295. doi: 10.1080/01426390220149520
[2]	GUNDERSEN V, STANGE E, KALTENBORN B, et al. Public visual preferences for dead wood in natural boreal forests:the effects of added information[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017, 158:12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.020
[3]	DENG S Q, YAN J F, GUAN Q W, et al. Short-term effects of thinning intensity on scenic beauty values of different stands[J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2013, 18(3):209-219. doi: 10.1007/s10310-012-0342-5
[4]	HUMPHREY K, UNDERWOOD G. Domain knowledge moderates the influence of visual saliency in scene recognition[J]. British Journal of Psychology, 2009, 100(2):377-398. doi: 10.1348/000712608X344780
[5]	LUCIO J V D, MOHAMADIAN M, RUIZ J, et al. Visual landscape exploration as revealed by eye movement tracking[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1996, 34(2):135-142. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(95)00208-1
[6]	赵新灿, 左洪福, 任勇军.眼动仪与视线跟踪技术综述[J].计算机工程与应用, 2006, 42(12):118-120. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-8331.2006.12.035
[7]	DUCHOWSKI A T. A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications[J]. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 2002, 34(4):455-470. doi: 10.3758/BF03195475
[8]	DUPONT L, ANTROP M, EETVELDE V V. Eye-tracking analysis in landscape perception research:influence of photograph properties and landscape characteristics[J]. Landscape Research, 2014, 39(4):417-432. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2013.773966
[9]	SEVENANT M. Variation in landscape perception and preference: experiences from case studies in rural and urban landscapes observed by different groups of respondents[D]. Belgium: Ghent University, 2010.
[10]	DUPONT L, OOMS K, ANTROP M, et al. Comparing saliency maps and eye-tracking focus maps:the potential use in visual impact assessment based on landscape photographs[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016, 148:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.007
[11]	DUPONT L, ANTROP M, EETVELDE V V. Does landscape related expertise influence the visual perception of landscape photographs? Implications for participatory landscape planning and management:[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 141:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.003
[12]	NORDH H, HAGERHALL C M, HOLMQVIST K. Tracking restorative components:patterns in eye movements as a consequence of a restorative rating task[J]. Landscape Research, 2013, 38(1):101-116. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2012.691468
[13]	BERTO R, MASSACCESI S, PASINI M. Do eye movements measured across high and low fascination photographs differ?:addressing Kaplan's fascination hypothesis[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2008, 28(2):185-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.004
[14]	DALMAIJER E S, MATH T S, Van Der STIGCHEL S. PyGaze:an open-source, cross-platform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2014, 46(4):913-921. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0422-2