拉美国家参与全球森林治理的3种模式

苏波

doi:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2022.0105.y

拉美国家参与全球森林治理的3种模式

doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2022.0105.y

苏波

上海电力大学马克思主义学院, 上海200090

基金项目: 国家社会科学基金青年项目“面向新工业革命的马克思主义科技创新驱动思想研究”（16CKS055）

详细信息

作者简介:
苏波，上海电力大学马克思主义学院能源与社会研究中心副主任，博士，研究方向为公共治理，E-mail：282318714@qq.com

联合国减少毁林和森林退化所致排放量合作计划（UN-REDD）是以联合国为框架而非西方国家主导的针对气候变化出台的REDD项目，旨在帮助发展中国家筹备REDD和参与未来的REDD机制。
中图分类号: F316.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 50
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-07-12
- 修回日期: 2022-12-19
- 网络出版日期: 2022-12-23
- 刊出日期: 2023-01-18

Three Modes of Latin American Countries’ Participation in Global Forest Governance: A Case Study of REDD

Bo Su

School of Marxism, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090, China

摘要

摘要: 随着对全球变暖和气候变化的担忧和关注在国际政策辩论中占据越来越重要的地位，全球对森林治理问题的兴趣和关注也在日益增长。森林已被定位为具有全球价值的碳库，对碳封存和缓解气候变暖具有重要作用。在这种背景下，拉丁美洲的森林治理在应对气候变化方面被视为具有全球重要性。文中以REDD为分析视角，从分阶段的方式出发，将拉美国家参与全球森林治理的模式分为以巴西为代表的自信模式、以哥伦比亚和哥斯达黎加为代表的包容模式和以玻利维亚为代表的抗拒模式3种；通过分析认为，拉美国家有最终实现减少森林砍伐和森林退化的巨大潜力以及利用其丰富的森林资源缓解气候变化的相应能力，但需要坚定森林治理和改革的决心并保证REDD政策实施的持续性。
- 森林治理 /
- 自信模式 /
- 包容模式 /
- 抗拒模式 /
- 巴西 /
- 哥伦比亚 /
- 哥斯达黎加 /
- 玻利维亚
Abstract: As the concerns about global warming and climate change occupy an increasingly important position in the international policy debates, global interest in forest governance has been growing. Forest is positioned as carbon sink with global value because of its contribution to carbon sequestration and climate warming mitigation. In this context, forest governance in Latin America is considered to be of global importance in addressing climate change. From the perspective of REDD, the paper divides Latin American countries’ participation in global forest governance into three modes, i.e., confidence mode represented by Brazil, inclusion mode represented by Colombia and Costa Rica, and resistance mode represented by Bolivia. Based on the analysis, it is argued that Latin American countries have the huge potential to eventually reduce deforestation and forest degradation and the corresponding ability to use their rich forest resources to mitigate climate change, but they need to strengthen their determination in forest governance and reform and ensure the sustainability of REDD policy implementation.
- forest governance /
- confidence model /
- inclusion model /
- resistance model /
- Brazil /
- Colombia /
- Costa Rica /
- Bolivia
注释:

1) 联合国减少毁林和森林退化所致排放量合作计划（UN-REDD）是以联合国为框架而非西方国家主导的针对气候变化出台的REDD项目，旨在帮助发展中国家筹备REDD和参与未来的REDD机制。

参考文献(26)

[1]	BULL B, AGUILAR-STØEN M. Changingelites, institutions and environmental governance[M]//DE CASTRO F, HOGENBOOM B, BAUD M. Environmentalpolitics in Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016: 137 − 163.
[2]	BÁRCENA A, PRADO A, SAMANIEGO J, et al. Climate change: a regional perspective[C]. Unity Summit of Latin America and the Caribbean, 22 and 23 February 2010, Riviera Maya, Mexico: 132-143.
[3]	PACHECO P, AGUILAR-STØEN M, BÖRNER J, et al. Landscape transformation in tropical Latin America: assessing trends and policy implications for REDD+[J]. Forests, 2011(2):1 − 29.
[4]	WUNDER S. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts[M]. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR, 2005: 95-106.
[5]	NEPSTAD D, FILHO B, MERRY F, et al. The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon[J]. Science, 2009, 326(5958):1350 − 1351. doi: 10.1126/science.1182108
[6]	LI T M. Thewill to improve: governmentality, development and the practice of politics[M]. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007: 202 − 207.
[7]	ANGELSEN A, BROWN S, LOISEL C, et al. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD): an options assessment report prepared for the Government of Norway[M]. Washington DC: Meridian Institute, 2009: 197-199.
[8]	洪进, 刘慧, 汪良兵. 混合治理: 缘起、维度创新与内涵延伸[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2019,29(2):64 − 69.
[9]	FAIRHEAD J, LEACH M. Sciencesociety and power: environmental knowledge and policy in west Africa and the Caribbean[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 77 − 89.
[10]	KARKKAINEN B C. Post-sovereign environmental governance[J]. Global Environmental Politics, 2004, 4(1):72 − 96. doi: 10.1162/152638004773730220
[11]	BERNSTEIN S. Legitimacy in global environmental governance[J]. Journal of International Law and International Relations, 2004, 1(1/2):139 − 166.
[12]	FORSYTH T. Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science[M]. New York: Routledge, 2003: 22 − 29.
[13]	ANGELSEN A, BROCKHAUS M, SUNDERLIN W D, et al. Analysing REDD+ challenges and choices[M]. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR, 2012: 45-49.
[14]	AGRAWAL A, NEPSTAD D, CHHATRE A. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2011, 36:373 − 396. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-042009-094508
[15]	SCOTT J. Seeinglike a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed[M]. London: Yale University Press, 1998: 44 − 61.
[16]	HALL A. Paying for environmental services: the case of Brazilian Amazonia[J]. Journal of International Development, 2008, 20(7):965 − 981. doi: 10.1002/jid.1456
[17]	TONI F. Decentralization and REDD+ in Brazil[J]. Forests, 2011(2):66 − 85.
[18]	MEYER P J. Brazil-US relations[M]. Washington DC: Library of Congress Congressional Research Service, 2010: 77-98.
[19]	ALESINA A. Institutional reforms: the case of Colombia[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005: 158-167.
[20]	ÁLVAREZM D. Forests in the time of violence conservation: implications of the Columbian War[J]. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2003, 16(3/4):49 − 70.
[21]	SÁNCHEZ-AZOFEIFA G A, HARRISS R C, SKOLE D L, et al. Deforestation in Costa Rica: a quantitative analysis using remote sensing imagery[J]. Biotropica, 2001, 33(3):378 − 384. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2001.tb00192.x
[22]	PAGIOLA S. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65:712 − 724. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.033
[23]	RUSSO R O, CANDELA G. Payment for environmental services in Costa Rica: evaluating impact and possibilities[J]. Tierra Tropical, 2006, 2(1):1 − 13.
[24]	BULL B, AGUILAR-STØEN M. Environmental politics in Latin America: elite dynamics, the left tide and sustainable development[M]. London: Routledge, 2014: 77 − 82.
[25]	GOLDMAN M, NADASDY P. Knowing nature: conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011: 32 − 67.
[26]	GUSTON D. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction[J]. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 2001, 26(4):399 − 408. doi: 10.1177/016224390102600401